The convergence of operational technology (OT) and information technology (IT) has created unprecedented challenges for security teams. As manufacturing facilities, utility providers, and other critical infrastructure sectors continue to digitize their operations, traditional security approaches no longer suffice.
Understanding and implementing OT security best practices have become crucial for protecting these vital systems.
Unlike IT breaches that might compromise data, OT security incidents can disrupt critical infrastructure, halt production, damage vital equipment, and even put human safety at risk. This reality demands a specialized approach to security that addresses the unique challenges of industrial environments.
Industrial environments answer to a patchwork of security frameworks - from NIST’s umbrella guidance to sector-specific directives issued by DOE, DHS, and the Department of Defense. Figuring out which one applies, who enforces it, and where to start can feel like decoding alphabet soup.
To simplify the journey, the U.S. Department of Energy’s Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP) has released a suite of no-cost self-assessment tools that map directly to the most common OT frameworks. The matrix below lines up each framework with its federal source, the regulating authority, and the FEMP resource you can use today, turning policy into an actionable first step.
Framework |
Origin |
Required Authority |
FEMP Tools |
NIST Cybersecurity Framework |
NIST 800-53 |
E.O. 13686, E.O. 13800 |
Facility Cybersecurity Framework, Distributed Energy Source Cybersecurity Framework (DERCF) |
Cybersecurity Capability Maturity Model |
U.S. Department of Energy |
Administration Request |
|
Risk Management Framework |
NIST 800-37 |
FISMA |
|
Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification |
U.S. Department of Defense |
U.S. Department of Defense
|
N/A |
Source: U.S. Department of Energy
Effective OT security relies on complete network visibility. The old adage "you can't secure what you can't see" rings especially true in OT environments. You must move beyond traditional monitoring methods like switch port analysers (SPANs) ports and embrace more robust solutions such as network test access points (TAPs) and packet brokers. These specialized tools provide constant, reliable network monitoring without introducing new vulnerabilities.
Other OT security best practices include:
Network segmentation represents another cornerstone of OT security best practices. Following the Purdue Enterprise Reference Architecture (PERA) model, it's important to establish clear boundaries between your IT and OT networks. This separation isn't just about creating distinct zones. It's about implementing a comprehensive security strategy that includes demilitarized zones (DMZs) between corporate and industrial networks, along with strict access controls between different levels. Validating these segmentation measures regularly ensures their continued effectiveness.
Access control in OT environments requires a delicate balance between security and operational efficiency. Multi-factor authentication and role-based access controls provide essential security layers, but only if you implement them in ways that don't impede critical operations. Additionally, it's a good idea to maintain detailed logs of all access attempts and regularly review permissions to ensure they align with your current operational needs.
The zero-trust framework is a crucial best practice for protecting industrial networks. This approach operates on the principle of "never trust, always verify." It treats every access request as if it originates from an untrusted network. In OT environments, this means implementing strict authentication and authorization processes for every device, user, and application attempting to access your network.
Unlike traditional IT environments, implementing zero-trust in OT requires careful consideration of operational requirements. You must balance rigorous security controls with the need for seamless operations. This involves implementing micro-segmentation at the workload level, continuously validating device and user identity, and granting access based on the principle of least privilege.
By combining zero-trust principles with Network Critical's specialized security solutions, like passive fiber TAPs and intelligent hybrid TAPs, you can create a robust security framework that addresses both modern and legacy system requirements.
In today’s interconnected industrial environments, unpatched software and firmware vulnerabilities present an open invitation to cyber attackers. Regularly updating and patching your OT systems is crucial for closing these security gaps and ensuring the integrity of your operations. However, patch management in OT environments can be challenging. Updates must be carefully tested and deployed to avoid unintended downtime or system failures.
A robust patch and vulnerability management program should include continuous vulnerability scanning, risk-based prioritisation of patches, and a structured testing process that validates updates in a controlled environment before deployment. This proactive approach helps secure critical assets, maintain compliance with regulations, and ultimately protect your industrial control systems from exploitation.
Threat detection capabilities must evolve to meet the unique challenges of OT environments. Traditional IT security tools often prove inadequate for industrial systems, which use specialized protocols and require different monitoring approaches. As such, you should implement security monitoring tools designed specifically for industrial environments, focusing on establishing baseline behaviour patterns and detecting anomalies that could indicate potential threats.
Incident response in OT environments demands special consideration. Unlike IT systems, where taking a server offline for investigation might be acceptable, OT systems need to maintain continuous operation. Develop and regularly test your response procedures that account for these operational requirements. This includes establishing clear communication channels and maintaining detailed recovery procedures that minimize disruption to critical processes.
Many industrial environments rely on equipment and software that may be decades old, designed long before OT cybersecurity was a significant concern. Rather than viewing these systems as insurmountable obstacles, approach them as opportunities to implement creative security solutions. Network TAPs can monitor your systems without requiring modifications, while compensating controls can provide additional security layers where direct measures aren't possible.
Additional FAQs | |
What is the first step in OT security? | Begin with a complete asset inventory and network map to see where OT devices reside and how they communicate. |
Which free federal tools help implement OT security frameworks? | Facility Cybersecurity Framework, Distributed Energy Source Cybersecurity Framework (DERCF), Facility Cybersecurity Capability Maturity Model, FCF-Risk Management Framework Hybrid Tool. |
The future of OT Cybersecurity lies in adopting a comprehensive approach that acknowledges both the technological and human elements of security. Regular training programs help your staff understand security protocols and respond effectively to potential threats. At the same time, continuously monitoring and improving security measures can keep you ahead of evolving threats.
Effective OT network monitoring requires a thoughtful, comprehensive approach that goes beyond traditional IT security measures. By implementing these best practices, you can better protect your critical infrastructure while maintaining operational efficiency.